amitga
04-04 09:19 AM
Is there a way to online check the status of PERM application.
wallpaper hp compaq presario cq61-115.
mhtanim
02-23 09:45 PM
Any updates on this?
bobby123
12-29 12:50 PM
You have to go through the same process as a New H1B and it stamped in INDIA again and also get in touch with your new employer he should be able to give you the info you need. Their is no new form to be filled in.
2011 Compaq Presario CQ61 Ac
yaratnaparkhi
10-05 02:23 PM
Myself and my wife are both on H1-b. Our 485 was applied in Jul 07. I have to apply for EAD by myself. Can I apply for EAD now and then apply for AP(I-131) at a later time ?
more...
.jpg "Company Compaq Presario")
krishna_brc
02-02 05:01 PM
Hi
Here is my situation and looking for any previous experience and suggestion from experts.
I have my EAD valid for 2 years PD 05 EB2. I got a job from another company but vendor says I need to be in his payroll. Job wise everything is good. I want to join him on EAD.
Here are my concerns
1. Should file for AC21 or just keep quite till CIS sends a letter ?
2. If I ensure my new job and old job responsibilities are same, am I safe ?
Do you see any problems or advise me for anything.
Thanks
tempgc
As long as New Job and Old Job are SAME/SIMILAR and assuming your I-40 is approved & 180 days passed, you should be perfectly fine.
IF
your previous employer is going to revoke I-140
THEN
its better to file AC21
ELSE
just keep quite till CIS sends a letter
END IF
Thanks,
Krishna
Here is my situation and looking for any previous experience and suggestion from experts.
I have my EAD valid for 2 years PD 05 EB2. I got a job from another company but vendor says I need to be in his payroll. Job wise everything is good. I want to join him on EAD.
Here are my concerns
1. Should file for AC21 or just keep quite till CIS sends a letter ?
2. If I ensure my new job and old job responsibilities are same, am I safe ?
Do you see any problems or advise me for anything.
Thanks
tempgc
As long as New Job and Old Job are SAME/SIMILAR and assuming your I-40 is approved & 180 days passed, you should be perfectly fine.
IF
your previous employer is going to revoke I-140
THEN
its better to file AC21
ELSE
just keep quite till CIS sends a letter
END IF
Thanks,
Krishna
Prashanthi
07-30 06:00 PM
I am going to complete my 6th year on H-1b, this year end. My I 140 is cleared and I am going to file for 3 years extension. In the beginning of this year, for 3 months pay stubs are not run, due to some personal reasons. Will this affect my renewal of H1. We need to submit 3 pay stubs, before applying for extension. There will be a shortfall of YTD, when compared to actual. Please share your thoughts, who have clear understanding on these. thanking you.
Will be a problem if they notice, hopefully they will overlook this. As per the Law you have to be on the payroll at all times unless the company has granted you unpaid leave for a very valid reason such as medical emergency etc.
Will be a problem if they notice, hopefully they will overlook this. As per the Law you have to be on the payroll at all times unless the company has granted you unpaid leave for a very valid reason such as medical emergency etc.
more...
jags_e
07-18 11:09 PM
The DHS ombudsman has a call-in coming Friday afternoon where we can give feedback to his report to congress.
In the Spotlight
"How Is It Working For You?" The CIS Ombudsman's Community Call-In Teleconference Series provides a forum to hear issues of concern to individuals and employers as they interact with USCIS.
"The Ombudsman's 2007 Annual Report to Congress: Your Questions and Comments"
Session 1: Thursday, July 12, 1:30 p.m. � 2:30 p.m.
Session 2: Thursday, July 12, 3:00 p.m. � 4:00 p.m.
"The Ombudsman's Recommendations to USCIS: Your Questions and Comments"
Session 1: Friday, July 20, 1:30 - 2:30 p.m.
Session 2: Friday, July 20, 3:00 - 4:00 p.m.
Find more details at http://www.dhs.gov/xabout/structure/editorial_0482.shtm
In the Spotlight
"How Is It Working For You?" The CIS Ombudsman's Community Call-In Teleconference Series provides a forum to hear issues of concern to individuals and employers as they interact with USCIS.
"The Ombudsman's 2007 Annual Report to Congress: Your Questions and Comments"
Session 1: Thursday, July 12, 1:30 p.m. � 2:30 p.m.
Session 2: Thursday, July 12, 3:00 p.m. � 4:00 p.m.
"The Ombudsman's Recommendations to USCIS: Your Questions and Comments"
Session 1: Friday, July 20, 1:30 - 2:30 p.m.
Session 2: Friday, July 20, 3:00 - 4:00 p.m.
Find more details at http://www.dhs.gov/xabout/structure/editorial_0482.shtm
2010 COMPAQ presario-cq61 Battery
mbooth
08-20 09:02 AM
hmmm... i've been trying to export as an eps to freehand or as ai to illustrator, neither of which have been working because i think the file's too big (1200 x 2400). when i export the resulting file appears to be just vertical lines. i'll try just copying and pasting, if it works i will be a happy camper.
matt
matt
more...
sanju
01-22 03:49 PM
the link you provided did not show any "Interestnig Cricket Widget on IV". Is that the correct link?
.
.
hair compaq presario cq61-415tu.
jliechty
June 8th, 2005, 07:32 AM
Certainly nicer than watery milk. .........nice photos!
Quoted For Truth :D
Good job on the soft water, P T :)
Quoted For Truth :D
Good job on the soft water, P T :)
more...
ivuser9
02-02 05:24 PM
I am on AOS and currently working on my EAD. If I lose the job and employer terminates the health insurance, then will I qualify for the COBRA coverage or is it strictly for the Greencard/citizens? Any info is greatly helpful.
Thanks
IVUSer
Thanks
IVUSer
hot Company Compaq Presario
buddyinsd
10-26 02:18 AM
Funny answer to a funny question ha ha :D
I hope you know how to search for info in Google. Just search it and do your basic research and then you can come back and ask question.
Then the answers here would make a lot more sense.
I hope you know how to search for info in Google. Just search it and do your basic research and then you can come back and ask question.
Then the answers here would make a lot more sense.
more...
house HP Compaq Presario CQ61-410US
hpandey
10-09 10:19 AM
Its more like paranoid journalism and the author's background states she has a degree in investigative journalism:mad:
I don't get it - how can USCIS take a sample of 250 people out of the 65000 visas alotted and say that 21 % of them were fraud ( 13% totally and 8 % technically ) . Its like taking only the fraud cases out of thousands and then saying that there is 100% fraud. I bet the fraud cases are not as high as 20% that the author and USCIS say.
It is sad to see that although we H1b immigrants get paid more than the American people ( considering what the employer gets from the client ) and even then we have to hear that we are lowly paid. Speaking from my point of view I know I am paid far more than my american counterparts in the same job profile.
I don't get it - how can USCIS take a sample of 250 people out of the 65000 visas alotted and say that 21 % of them were fraud ( 13% totally and 8 % technically ) . Its like taking only the fraud cases out of thousands and then saying that there is 100% fraud. I bet the fraud cases are not as high as 20% that the author and USCIS say.
It is sad to see that although we H1b immigrants get paid more than the American people ( considering what the employer gets from the client ) and even then we have to hear that we are lowly paid. Speaking from my point of view I know I am paid far more than my american counterparts in the same job profile.
tattoo 6600mAh Compaq Presario b2800
Blog Feeds
05-30 12:30 PM
Silicon Valley Immigration Lawyer Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
Across Silicon Valley and the rest of the U.S., many employers are avoiding layoffs by reducing employee hours or by cutting salaries. However, H-1B visa (http://www.geelaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1054805.html)holders, and their employers, can run afoul of U.S. immigration laws if the salary is cut without a corresponding reduction in hours.
An H-1B employer must attest to the Department of Labor, that the employer is paying the H-1B employee the higher of either: 1) the prevailing wage for the same occupational classification in the same area of employment, or 2) the actual wage level paid by the employer to all employees with similar experience and qualifications for the same job. When submitting the H-1B petition, the employer must state the number of hours per week that they will employ the H-1B worker. So if the prevailing wage for a software engineer in the San Jose metropolitan area is $40/hr., then for a full-time job the annual salary would be $83,200. This would be the minimum that the employer would need to pay annually, and an employer could always pay more.
Suppose your Palo Alto employer informs you that all professionals are taking an across-the-board 15% pay cut. If the prevailing wage for your job is $83,200, a 15% pay cut would lower your salary to $70,720. If your employer started paying you only $70,720 annually while you were still working full-time, your employer would be violating the H-1B regulations, and you could be in violation of your H1-B status. However, if your hours were reduced to only 34 hours per week, then at $40/hour you would earn $70,720 annually. Therefore, an employer and its H-1B employee could properly follow the H-1B regulations by reducing the employee's hours enough to still comply with the prevailing wage. Of course, in this example, the H-1B employee would only be able to work 34 hours per week.
More... (http://www.siliconvalleyimmigrationlawyer.com/2009/11/a-paycut-could-mean-parttime-f.html)
Across Silicon Valley and the rest of the U.S., many employers are avoiding layoffs by reducing employee hours or by cutting salaries. However, H-1B visa (http://www.geelaw.com/lawyer-attorney-1054805.html)holders, and their employers, can run afoul of U.S. immigration laws if the salary is cut without a corresponding reduction in hours.
An H-1B employer must attest to the Department of Labor, that the employer is paying the H-1B employee the higher of either: 1) the prevailing wage for the same occupational classification in the same area of employment, or 2) the actual wage level paid by the employer to all employees with similar experience and qualifications for the same job. When submitting the H-1B petition, the employer must state the number of hours per week that they will employ the H-1B worker. So if the prevailing wage for a software engineer in the San Jose metropolitan area is $40/hr., then for a full-time job the annual salary would be $83,200. This would be the minimum that the employer would need to pay annually, and an employer could always pay more.
Suppose your Palo Alto employer informs you that all professionals are taking an across-the-board 15% pay cut. If the prevailing wage for your job is $83,200, a 15% pay cut would lower your salary to $70,720. If your employer started paying you only $70,720 annually while you were still working full-time, your employer would be violating the H-1B regulations, and you could be in violation of your H1-B status. However, if your hours were reduced to only 34 hours per week, then at $40/hour you would earn $70,720 annually. Therefore, an employer and its H-1B employee could properly follow the H-1B regulations by reducing the employee's hours enough to still comply with the prevailing wage. Of course, in this example, the H-1B employee would only be able to work 34 hours per week.
More... (http://www.siliconvalleyimmigrationlawyer.com/2009/11/a-paycut-could-mean-parttime-f.html)
more...
pictures HP Compaq Presario CQ61
rockstart
04-07 09:19 AM
With the new 180 days rule for NC I guess we should not be worrying too much about it.
dresses hp compaq Presario CQ50
buddyinus
09-16 02:08 PM
http://morejazzbythebay.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/sanjoserallybnr4-2.jpg
SAN JOSE WAS THE BEGINNING, DC WILL BE A HUGE MILESTONE!
(San Jose rally pictures and videos, and Aman's messages from Milpitas, CA meeting can be found at http://morejazzbythebay.wordpress.com (http://morejazzbythebay.wordpress.com/))
http://images.jupiterimages.com/common/detail/20/99/22609920.jpg
cheers, and see ya'll in DC!
jazz
LOL...Plz change the title to "I Need u". The current title implies something else :D
SAN JOSE WAS THE BEGINNING, DC WILL BE A HUGE MILESTONE!
(San Jose rally pictures and videos, and Aman's messages from Milpitas, CA meeting can be found at http://morejazzbythebay.wordpress.com (http://morejazzbythebay.wordpress.com/))
http://images.jupiterimages.com/common/detail/20/99/22609920.jpg
cheers, and see ya'll in DC!
jazz
LOL...Plz change the title to "I Need u". The current title implies something else :D
more...
makeup wallpaper Compaq Presario
paragpujara
08-01 10:45 AM
A# same as the A# on the Beneficiary field on I-140 approval notice.
girlfriend for Compaq Presario cq61
Ann Ruben
06-25 04:28 PM
In the US, attorney ethics rules vary somewhat from state to state. In most states, you are clearly entitled to all substantive materials contained in your case file. Unless the retainer/fee agreement clearly obligates you to pay for copying costs in this circumstance, the law firm should give you the documents you want without charge.
hairstyles Compaq Presario CQ61-322ER Fan
roseball
03-31 10:49 PM
If the new PWD guidelines were effective 01/01/10, then it shouldn't effect your PWD since it was filed on 12/30/09. You should try and find some document or FAQs to prove the same and send them to your lawyer. My guess is he might have messed up something in your process and is trying to cover it up with this story. Its better to have him re-start the process in that case because if he infact messed up something and he files your PERM, it could be potentially denied which will directly impact you...Try to find out if what he is saying is infact true (which I doubt), or if he is just mistaken..
Blog Feeds
09-10 07:50 PM
Hunton Immigration and Nationality Law Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
On July 1, 2010, the Vital Statistics Office of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico began issuing new, more secure Puerto Rican birth certificates to US Citizens born in Puerto Rico. As of October 1, 2010, all certified copies of Puerto Rican birth certificates issued prior to July 1, 2010, will no longer be valid. Accordingly, the Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a press release providing guidance to US employers with regard to the I-9 process. For new employees, employers may continue to accept all Puerto Rican birth certificates through September 30, 2010; after that date, only the new Puerto Rican birth certificates (issued on or after July 1, 2010) we be acceptable for I-9 purposes. Therefore, as of October 1, 2010, employers must pay close attention to the issuance date of Puerto Rican birth certificates presented for I-9 purposes.
For existing employees, there is no need to re-verify the employment authorization of employees who previously presented pre-July 1, 2010, Puerto Rican birth certificates. Federal Contractors subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation E-Verify clause may continue to accept all Puerto Rican birth certificates prior to October 1, 2010, but beginning on that date, only the new Puerto Rican birth certificates issued on or after July 1, 2010, will be acceptable. Federal Contractors may not ask for the newer version during I-9 reverification of those individuals who previously presented the older version of the Puerto Rican birth certificates.
The USCIS memo can be found here (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=45e3285ca77fa210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD).
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~4/25g-Wwo_N40
More... (http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~3/25g-Wwo_N40/)
On July 1, 2010, the Vital Statistics Office of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico began issuing new, more secure Puerto Rican birth certificates to US Citizens born in Puerto Rico. As of October 1, 2010, all certified copies of Puerto Rican birth certificates issued prior to July 1, 2010, will no longer be valid. Accordingly, the Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a press release providing guidance to US employers with regard to the I-9 process. For new employees, employers may continue to accept all Puerto Rican birth certificates through September 30, 2010; after that date, only the new Puerto Rican birth certificates (issued on or after July 1, 2010) we be acceptable for I-9 purposes. Therefore, as of October 1, 2010, employers must pay close attention to the issuance date of Puerto Rican birth certificates presented for I-9 purposes.
For existing employees, there is no need to re-verify the employment authorization of employees who previously presented pre-July 1, 2010, Puerto Rican birth certificates. Federal Contractors subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation E-Verify clause may continue to accept all Puerto Rican birth certificates prior to October 1, 2010, but beginning on that date, only the new Puerto Rican birth certificates issued on or after July 1, 2010, will be acceptable. Federal Contractors may not ask for the newer version during I-9 reverification of those individuals who previously presented the older version of the Puerto Rican birth certificates.
The USCIS memo can be found here (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=45e3285ca77fa210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD).
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~4/25g-Wwo_N40
More... (http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~3/25g-Wwo_N40/)
neoneo
12-07 08:43 PM
IV Folks,
There are a bunch of people who want to send webfaxes, but they don't want to register.. these are green card holders.. please change it so that people cn just type in their NAme and address instead of registering like numbersusa.org
There are a bunch of people who want to send webfaxes, but they don't want to register.. these are green card holders.. please change it so that people cn just type in their NAme and address instead of registering like numbersusa.org
No comments:
Post a Comment